[DRAFT] Re-add azureblob + gcs to the destination type enum (ENG-4200) - #397
Draft
RajatPawar wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
[DRAFT] Re-add azureblob + gcs to the destination type enum (ENG-4200)#397RajatPawar wants to merge 1 commit into
RajatPawar wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Add-back for the blob-storage withhold. Restores the two enum values and the type description. Merge only once we control the written object naming. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
RajatPawar
force-pushed
the
rajatspawar/eng-4200-readd-blob-storage
branch
from
August 18, 2026 23:24
283c62c to
4a86b24
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft / do not merge yet. Add-back PR for ENG-4200, kept ready for when we control the blob object naming.
Restores
azureblobandgcsin the destinationtypeenum and the type description (reverses #396). The per-field descriptions were never removed. Merging this regenerates the client SDK to include the two types again.Before merging: confirm we control the written object naming and merge alongside the server, docs, and dashboard add-backs (linked on ENG-4200).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code